Legal Opinion

Fiorito v. Interurban Steet Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 27, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from City Court of New York. Action by Alfredo Fiorito against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed. :

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The complaint distinctly proceeded upon negligence in the starting of the car while the plaintiff was in the act of boarding it, and the proof offered was effective only in support of a totally different cause of action—an assault by the conductor and the violent ejection of the plaintiff from the car after he had boarded it in safety. That the trial court had no power to conform the pleadings to the proof, where this variance was pointed out by motion to.dismiss at the close of the plaintiff’s case, and that an earlier objection to the proof was unnecessary to protect the defendant’s rights…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Block v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Block v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hammer v. Independent Lamp & Wire Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API