State v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRIA, Judge.
The State appeals, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-979 and § 15A-1445(b), an order granting Thomas Armstrong’s (“defendant”) motion to suppress evidence seized by virtue of a search without a search warrant. We reverse and remand.
About 1:45 a.m. on 13 February 2012, Officers Jonathan Scher (“Officer Scher”) and Bryce Carr (“Officer Carr”) (collectively “the officers”) of the Gastonia Police Department observed a black Chevrolet Impala (“the Impala”) execute a three-point turn in the middle of an intersection, strike a parked vehicle, and continue traveling on the left side…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. IsleibSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
- State v. WombleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. WombleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. WombleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021