Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 2014No. COA14-162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

The State appeals, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-979 and § 15A-1445(b), an order granting Thomas Armstrong’s (“defendant”) motion to suppress evidence seized by virtue of a search without a search warrant. We reverse and remand.

About 1:45 a.m. on 13 February 2012, Officers Jonathan Scher (“Officer Scher”) and Bryce Carr (“Officer Carr”) (collectively “the officers”) of the Gastonia Police Department observed a black Chevrolet Impala (“the Impala”) execute a three-point turn in the middle of an intersection, strike a parked vehicle, and continue traveling on the left side…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. IsleibSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  2. State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  3. State v. WombleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. WombleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. WombleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API