Ardolina v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether a real partnership, within the meaning of the federal revenue laws, existed between the taxpayer and his wife. The Tax Court held that it did not.
Petitioner and his wife were married in 1919. He was then a bench hand employed in the jewelry trade. His rate of pay was 65(£ an hour. He testified that he “ * * never made enough money to carry a 'home along.” Mrs. Ardolina had worked in a factory prior to her marriage and she continued with that employment until 1924. She had a baby that year and remained home thereafter. Though she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lusthaus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Drennen v. London Assurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Miller v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eisenberg v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Joe Lynch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Harkness v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- West v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Hornback v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.