Legal Opinion
Applegate v. Applegate
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Action to annul a marriage.
1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, J.
Action to annul a marriage. The defendant had been married to one Berg. In 1903 she commenced an action to recover a judgment of divorce against said Berg in the Supreme Court of Kings county. The defendant defaulted, and upon the proof submitted it was directed by the justice presiding that judgment be entered for the plaintiff in that action. Neither an interlocutory nor a final judgment was ever entered. The plaintiff in this action was present on June 3, 1903, the time of the taking of the testimony in the divorce suit. He employed the attorney for the plaintiff in that divorce action and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Fenton v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Clayton v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Collins v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Rose v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- Leeds v. JoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Sorensen v. SorensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of BurrowsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- In re the Estate of SokoloffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.