Legal Opinion

Patel v. Martin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 2018No. SJC 12500PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.

**30 The primary issue on appeal is whether a party in a civil case has the right to an immediate appeal from a discovery order under the doctrine of present execution. The defendants here argue that, after the motion judge ordered the disclosure of communications that they contend are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, they will be irremediably harmed if they cannot immediately appeal from that order. We conclude that a party has no such right of interlocutory appeal.

*1085 In so holding, we note that a party nevertheless retains two other avenues to seek immediate…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. CATHERINE BRAUNER & another v. DOYLE C. VALLEY, personal representative.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  2. SAID S. ABUZAHRA v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  3. Commonwealth v. VinesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  4. Myrick v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  5. Alberti v. AlbertiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API