Legal Opinion

D.A.N. Joint Venture III, L.P. v. Turk

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 28, 2006No. 94,697PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

D.A.N. Joint Venture III, L.P. (DAN) appeals the district court’s order awarding attorney fees to Brad and Peggy Turk for a violation of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code (UCCC), K.S.A. 16a-2-101 et seq. Specifically, the district court found DAN was in violation of the UCCC for charging interest on the interest portion of a judgment against the Turks. We affirm.

On November 30, 2000, DAN sued Brad and Peggy Turk for failure to make monthly payments under a promissory note. Peggy accepted service of process for herself and Brad, even though they had been divorced since 1998.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. NielanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Cooper v. WerholtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Varner v. Gulf InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Neodesha v. BP Corp. North America Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
  2. CITIFINANCIAL MORTG. CO., INC. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. CITIFINANCIAL MORTG. CO., INC. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API