D.A.N. Joint Venture III, L.P. v. Turk
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Malone, J.:
D.A.N. Joint Venture III, L.P. (DAN) appeals the district court’s order awarding attorney fees to Brad and Peggy Turk for a violation of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code (UCCC), K.S.A. 16a-2-101 et seq. Specifically, the district court found DAN was in violation of the UCCC for charging interest on the interest portion of a judgment against the Turks. We affirm.
On November 30, 2000, DAN sued Brad and Peggy Turk for failure to make monthly payments under a promissory note. Peggy accepted service of process for herself and Brad, even though they had been divorced since 1998.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. NielanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Cooper v. WerholtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Varner v. Gulf InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Neodesha v. BP Corp. North America Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- CITIFINANCIAL MORTG. CO., INC. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- CITIFINANCIAL MORTG. CO., INC. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008