Legal Opinion

Ritter v. . Worth

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This was an action of ejectment to recover the possession of premises described as lots ten, twelve and twenty-four in block five in the county of Kings. (Reported below, 1 M". T. S. 0. [T. & 0.], 406.)' ‘ The plaintiffs proved title in fee in John Ritter of lot twenty-four ; that said Ritter died leaving Jane Ritter, his widow, and the plaintiffs, his only children and heirs at law.

Read the full summary

This was an action of ejectment to recover the possession of premises described as lots ten, twelve and twenty-four in block five in the county of Kings. (Reported below, 1 M". T. S. 0. [T. & 0.], 406.)' ‘ The plaintiffs proved title in fee in John Ritter of lot twenty-four ; that said Ritter died leaving Jane Ritter, his widow, and the plaintiffs, his only children and heirs at law. Defendant claimed title to said lot under a comptroller’s deed dated January 2d, 1869, conveying the lot to him, which recited that the same had been returned for non-payment of taxes assessed thereon as…

1Opinion of the Court

Grover, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur on the ground of error in rejecting evidence of former suit pending, and also hold the rejection of proof as to the delivery of deed to Walters error; disagreeing with opinion on this point.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claflin v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brown & Son v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Claflin v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Goodsite Realty Co. v. HaddadNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Marden v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API