Legal Opinion
American Laundry Machinery Mfg. Co. v. Adams Laundry Machinery Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Application for injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from making and selling what are known as “conveyer dry rooms,” and which are alleged to infringe the first six claims of United States letters patent No. 684,776, dated October 22, 1901, to William M. Barnes for “clothes dryer.”
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The six claims of United States letters patent to William M. Barnes, No. 684,77.6, dated October 22, 1901, for clothes dryer, and alleged to be infringed by the defendant, read as follows:
“1. In combination, a drying-room having heating-coils extending upwardly on the side thereof, a conveyer traversing said room, the central portion of said room beneath the conveyer being devoid of heating-coils and an air-circulating device in said room above said conveyer driving said air downward.
“2. In combination, a drying-room having heating-coils extending upwardly on the side…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co. v. Municipal Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Barnes v. LingoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1907
- Shoemaker v. MerrowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Laundry Machinery Mfg. Co. v. Troy Laundry Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1909