In re Divco Philadelphia Sales Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge.
Upon consideration of the Motion of Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the *200“PBGC”) for Amendment of Opinion, and briefs and arguments of counsel thereon, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. That the PBGC’s Motion is granted;
2. That the Opinion accompanying the Court’s Order of August 8, 1986, 64 B.R. 232 is hereby amended to replace the analysis of 29 U.S.C. § 1368 on pages 234-35 of the Opinion with the following:
On asserting that the claim of the Pension Fund is a tax, the trustee relies on § 4068(c)(2) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1368(c)(2). This reliance is misplaced.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Divco Philadelphia Sales Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Divco Philadelphia Sales CorpUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986