Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 4, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellee recovered damages against appellant for personal injuries suffered by ber when run over on tbe latter’s railroad tracks near Paintsville. Tbe principal issue on tbis appeal is wbetber or not tbe company was entitled to a directed verdict. Tbis in turn depends on wbetber appellee was a trespasser or a licensee at tbe place of tbe accident.

Appellee was struck on appellant’s tracks at a point approximately a half a mile northeast of the Paintsville city limits. Between the City and the place of the accident is a small community known as G-reentown. Several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Arrowood's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Sizemore's Administrator v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Bush's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Adams' Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lopez v. New Jersey TransitNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API