Legal Opinion
Rocio Martinez-De Ryan v. Jefferson Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2018No. 15-70759PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROCIO AURORA MARTINEZ-DE No. 15-70759 RYAN, Petitioner, Agency No. A096-025-359 v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 9, 2018* San Francisco, California Filed July 17, 2018 Before: Susan P. Graber and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges, and Ivan L.R. Lemelle,** District Judge. Opinion by Judge Graber * The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Boutilier v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manuel Olivas-Motta v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Antonio Islas-Veloz v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ryan v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Rocio Martinez-De Ryan v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018