Legal Opinion

Damerau v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Although defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of. law (see, Gouchie v Gill, 198 AD2d 862), plaintiffs met their burden of raising a material issue of fact (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324-325). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs (see, Dix v Pines Hotel, 188 AD2d 1007), establishes an issue of fact whether defendant Roy L. Johnson had sufficient time to take…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Gouchie v. GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Gaeta v. MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Dix v. Pines Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Ostberg v. CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Hackett v. DriverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API