First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Dallas v. Sharp
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentSmith, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I cannot agree with the majority that its holding in this particular case is justified on the ground that Sharp’s bid was, in effect, for cash and that the trustee acted arbitrarily and unreasonably in making the sale to the mortgagee, a lower bidder than Sharp, without allowing Sharp “a few minutes’ time within which to produce the cash for his bid, when this could have been done without prejudice to the mortgagee.” Sharp relies upon this ground and the majority sustains the contention in spite of the well-settled rule that a sale under a power in a mortgage or a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blum v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Stern v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Burnam v. BlockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Tanner v. GrishamTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Dwelle & Daniel v. Blackshear BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.