Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 8, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered May 29, 1978 (Sherman, J.) modified by granting petitioner’s application for a turnover order and directing respondent to comply with petitioner’s income execution only to the extent that the judgment debtor’s disposable earnings are not diminished by more than 25%; as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to the appellant.

As we construe title III of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (US Code, tit 15, §§ 1671-1677), the maximum amount which may be garnished from the earnings of an individual for any workweek is 25% of his "disposable earnings” (i.e., after-tax…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Costa v. Chevrolet-TonawandaBuffalo City Court · 1963
  3. Costa v. Chevrolet-Tonawanda Division of General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Long Island Trust Company v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. Midlantic National Bank/North v. ReifDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  3. Kahn v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Carol J. v. William J.New York City Family Court · 1983
  5. Commissioner of Social Services v. John H.New York City Family Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API