Legal Opinion

Subia v. Riveland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 5, 2001No. 24627-9-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

The Washington Department of Corrections (DOC) appeals a jury verdict in favor of employee Gerónimo Subia. Alleging race discrimination, Subia sued DOC for placing him on administrative leave pending investigation of an inmate’s sexual misconduct accusations. DOC argues that the trial court erred in (1) refusing to grant it summary judgment; (2) excluding evidence that the accusing inmate had passed a polygraph examination; and (3) denying DOC’s motion for judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the verdict. Holding that it was error to have excluded the polygraph examination results as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerlach v. Cove Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Subia v. RivelandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Kimberly Gerlach v. The Cove ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API