Ferradas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The record contains competent evidence upon which a jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the sexual act between the victim and the defendant was nonconsensual. Further, the court’s exclusion of evidence that the victim had successfully escaped an attempted gang assault two years earlier was not an abuse of discretion. See Nelson v. State, 395 So.2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (cross-examination must be shown to be relevant, and determination of relevancy is within the discretion of the trial court); Ray v. State, 262 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (trial court properly excluded…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Kruse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Trees by & Through Trees v. K-MARTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Bloodworth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.