Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Peterson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1995No. 95-3028Published

1DissentCope, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would grant cer-tiorari and quash so much of the order as requires the State to produce death penalty evaluation forms in five active first degree murder cases. These are clearly work product and do not become public record until the conclusion of the case. State v. Kokal, 562 So.2d 324 (Fla.1990); § 119.07(3)(n), Fla. Stat. (1993); see also Walton v. Dugger, 634 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1993); Tal-Mason v. Satz, 614 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 269 (Fla.1993).

At this stage defendant has not made the necessary showing of need and undue hardship…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KokalSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. State v. RabinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Walton v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Tal-Mason v. SatzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API