Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Middleton & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certificate from the Court of Nisi Prius. This was an action brought by Messrs. Raymond and Fullerton against Edward and Charles Middleton, on a promissory note of which the following is a copy:— Philada., 2d Mo., 22, 1858. $2600. On the 10th day of December next, for value received, I promise to pay to John W. Middleton twenty-six hundred dollars, payable and negotiable without defalcation at the Kensington Bank. Signed Middleton & Co. Endorsed, John W. Middleton.

Read the full summary

Certificate from the Court of Nisi Prius. This was an action brought by Messrs. Raymond and Fullerton against Edward and Charles Middleton, on a promissory note of which the following is a copy:— Philada., 2d Mo., 22, 1858. $2600. On the 10th day of December next, for value received, I promise to pay to John W. Middleton twenty-six hundred dollars, payable and negotiable without defalcation at the Kensington Bank. Signed Middleton & Co. Endorsed, John W. Middleton. Pay to order of Charles Abert. R. J. Walker, Charles Abert. Pay to order of C. F. Yerkes, Cash’r. J. Hockley, Cash’r. The note,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.

So commonly are the terms “ or order,” “or bearer,” employed in commercial instruments, that we are apt to suppose them essential to negotiability. It is otherwise. Words are but the signs; thought is chiefly valuable; and when for a sufficient consideration, the minds of the parties have concurred in an agreement, that is a contract, and it must be executed as they intended, unless forbidden by law. “ Order ” or “ bearer ” are convenient and expressive, but clearly not the only words which will communicate the quality of negotiability. “…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. PoindexterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  2. Brenzer v. WightmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  3. Mandeville v. Union Bank of GeorgetownSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  4. Leidy v. TammanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  5. President of the Bank of North America v. BarriereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1794

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of North America v. BarriereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1794
  2. Sunday v. DietrichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API