Legal Opinion

People v. Gentile

New York County Courts

Decided June 17, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John V. Aylward, J.

Defendants move pursuant to CPL 210.20 (subd 1, par [e]) to dismiss the indictment against each defendant upon the grounds of a previous prosecution, after the Trial Judge, sua sponte and over the objection of the defendants, declared a mistrial when the Assistant District Attorney, after the trial had commenced, insisted that he would call the Trial Judge to testify at the jury trial over which he was the sole presiding Judge.

The decision of this motion involves the competing values of not subjecting a defendant to defend himself twice on the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. LandyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. PetgenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Hall v. PotokerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gentile v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Gentile v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  3. People v. GentileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Gentile v. County Of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API