Legal Opinion
County of Henderson v. James v. Allred
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1931No. 5915PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Commissioner LEDDY
delivered the opinion of the court.
Henderson county, through its proper officers, has been granted leave to file in this court its petition for mandamus to compel the attorney general of this state to approve $148,000 of road and bridge funding bonds ordered issued by the commissioners’ court of said county under the express authority conferred by the terms of H. B. No. 448, Special Acts 42nd Legislature (1931), p. 121, chap. 46.
The act in question is a local or special road law enacted for Henderson county without local notice having been given. Under its terms the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dallas County v. PlowmanTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Altgelt v. GutzeitTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Austin Bros. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Commissioners' Court of Limestone County v. GarrettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Bell County v. LightfootTexas Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- San Antonio Union Junior College District v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Garcia v. Duval CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Quinn v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Shelby County v. Provident Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.