Stewart v. Thomas Earle & Sons, Inc.

Kenworti-iey, J.,

Opinion by

The sole question is whether Horace Stewart, when he met his death, was a “Pennsylvania employe” of Thomas Earle & Sons, Inc. within the meaning of §101 of the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as last amended by §1 of the Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 520, 77 PS 1. The compensation authorities found that he was and, all the other essential facts having been established by stipulation, awarded compensation to his widow. On appeal the court of common pleas reversed and entered judgment for defendant. Claimant appeals.

The Act provides: “This Act......shall not apply to…