Wright v. Hanna
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Franklin, C.
This was an action by appellant against appellee for a malicious prosecution. Issue was formed by a denial to the complaint. There was a trial by jury, verdict for defendant, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered for the defendant. Appellant makes no discussion of the evidence.
The first reason insisted upon for a new trial by appellant in his brief is, that the court erred in permitting the defendant to prove upon the trial a conversation between himself and one Fullen in the absence of the plaintiff.
Fullen was a practicing attorney, and the deputy prosecutor for…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bell v. Atlantic City RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902