Legal Opinion

Wright v. Hanna

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1884No. 11,561PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

This was an action by appellant against appellee for a malicious prosecution. Issue was formed by a denial to the complaint. There was a trial by jury, verdict for defendant, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered for the defendant. Appellant makes no discussion of the evidence.

The first reason insisted upon for a new trial by appellant in his brief is, that the court erred in permitting the defendant to prove upon the trial a conversation between himself and one Fullen in the absence of the plaintiff.

Fullen was a practicing attorney, and the deputy prosecutor for…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell v. Atlantic City RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API