Legal Opinion

In re Anonymous No. 26 D.B. 78

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 1979No. Disciplinary Board Docket no. 26 D.B. 78Published

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FINDINGS OF FACT

On or about May 18, 1978, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition for discipline against respondent, asserting that respondent’s conduct in mailing in January of 1978 a number of documents to members of the general public who were not at the time clients of respondent and who had not at the time sought to be represented by him violated two Disciplinary Rules: D.R. 2-103(A) and D.R. 2-103(B).

On or about June 15, 1978, respondent filed an answer admitting that he had mailed the documents in question, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API