Legal Opinion

Levine v. Barricini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Under all the facts and circumstances disclosed in this record, we find that Special Term should not have denied defendant’s motion to permit defendant and witness to appear for examination or granted plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer and enter judgment for $0,319.32 in plaintiff’s favor by default. The claimed default was not so clearly deliberate or contumacious as to justify the extreme and drastic relief herein granted.

The orders and judgment appealed from should be reversed and defendant’s motion for an order permitting him and the witness to appear for examination,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MentoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Murphy v. SolomonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Corley v. East Aurora Metals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Kallus v. SadaccaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  5. Vastola v. CanariatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API