Legal Opinion

Pomare v. Pefu

High Court of American Samoa

Decided September 20, 2001No. LT No. 18-00Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

On November 20, 2000, plaintiffs Lila Pefu Pomare (“Lila”), Kaisara Pefu (“Kaisara”), and Asaua Fuimaono (“Asaua”) filed this action to enjoin defendant Anisi Pefu (“Anisi”) from completing the construction of a new building until the court can determine the parties’ rights in the underlying land. The complaint also seeks to void a trust agreement, executed by Pefu Fania (“Pefu”), which provides Anisi with control over the land; to require Anisi to restore about $18,000 of Pefu’s funds; to judicially recognize a deed of a portion of the land by Pefu to Asaua; and to divide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. MathewNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Preszler v. DudleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Seavey v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API