Plummer v. Sheldon
California Supreme Court
Consolidated appeals from judgments of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from orders dedenying new trials. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The plaintiff, a road overseer in the county of Sacramento, brought a separate action against each of the appellants here for the obstruction of a public road. For convenience, the appeals, are to be heard upon a single consolidated statement on motion for a new trial, and the judgment roll of each case.
The court below found in favor of the plaintiff in each case, and from the judgment therein rendered, and orders denying a new trial, these appeals are prosecuted. The determination of one involves that of the others.
The main questions raised for a reversal of the judgments and orders…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bolger v. FossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Babcock v. WelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. SavercoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- United States v. RindgeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1913
- Laguna Beach v. Consolidated Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Arnold v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953