Legal Opinion
In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 24, 2004No. 02 MDL 1484(MP), 02CV10221(MP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs claim that allegations in their Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, incorporating by reference 7 of the 309 complaints in the Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92(SAS) (“IPO Securities Litigation”), require me to disqualify myself under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) because of my financial holdings in Citigroup, Inc., the parent of Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (“SSB”), and Lehman Brothers, Inc. (“Lehman”). Neither of these companies is named as a defendant in this action. Rather they are defendants in certain of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TurnbowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- FARZAN v. CLEARYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- FARZAN v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Farina v. The Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023