Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Keenan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 19, 1994No. 92 C 761PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NORDBERG, District Judge.

Before the Court are the “Motion of Plaintiffs for Amendment of Judgment” and Defendants’ motion for sanctions.

Plaintiffs Lloyd D. Mitchell Sr. and his wife Leola sued Charles K. Keenan, the principal at the Jane Neil School, the Chicago Board of Education, four Chicago police officers, and the City of Chicago pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 (1988). After Plaintiffs’ filing of a Third Amended Complaint, the Defendant City of Chicago filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint or in the Alternative for Summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TriplettIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. ReeseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. People Ex Rel. De Vos v. LaurinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Dobiecki v. PalaciosDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  5. The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Velazquez v. SternesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  2. Jenkins v. MeginnisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API