Legal Opinion

Five Twelve Locust, Inc. v. Mednikow

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 12, 1954No. 43890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the cross-claim of appellant-defendants *771Mary S. Dyer et al., seeking a mandatory injunction. Respondent Melvin J. Medni-kow is the record owner of the seven story Oriel Building in the City of St.' Louis. The other respondents, whom it is unnecessary to name herein, are the owners of unrecorded beneficial interests in said building. Appellants are the owners of an undisclosed undivided interest in the property lying to the east of the Oriel Building. The defendant owners of other fractional interests of the property lying east of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edie v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Pradelt v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. City of Kirksville v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Meyer v. MetzlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Maremont v. OvenuIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mooney v. CanterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Shore v. BaumbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API