Markos v. Cain
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HARTER. J.
DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PETITION — SUSTAINED.
As a preface to this opinion, this Branch of this Court wishes to have it distinctly understood that he is in no way passing upon the merits of this litigation; rather, we are now dealing solely with a problem of procedure. — It would, as we see it, be premature for us to attempt to decide the merits of this case on a “matter of law” basis.
The sole problem to which we are now directing our attention is whether plaintiff has adequately alleged in his petition in this case that he is “interested.”
The petition states “The plaintiff…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Weber v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hicks v. Cain, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957
- Terwilliger v. LesterTrumbull County Court of Common Pleas · 1969
- Toll v. SchaefferOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
- Clay v. VigorOhio Court of Appeals · 1959