Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1936No. 17873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, a fine of twenty-five dollars.

This case was tried before the Judge of the County Court, a jury being waived. There are no bills of exception, and the only question is the sufficiency of the testimony.

The assault is based on a collision of a car driven by appellant, with another in which the injured party, Helen Rainbolt, was with her brother, Mr. Campbell. It is averred that the assault was wilful and with negligence, as provided in Art. 1149, P. C., but nothing in the record presents any suggestion of wilfulness, and we do not…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Froelich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API