Legal Opinion
Sours v. Kneipp
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 2006No. 40,770-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
hThe plaintiff, William Sours, appeals the judgment of the trial court sustaining an exception of res judicata filed by the defendant, Donald L. Kneipp, in this legal malpractice proceeding. For the reasons assigned below, .the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.
*982FACTS
Williams Sours, a resident of California, retained Donald Kneipp to file a lawsuit on his behalf challenging a Louisiana property settlement Mr. Sours had entered into upon the dissolution of his marriage. The trial court rejected Mr. Sours’ demands and ruled in favor of his former wife. Mr. Sours appealed, and in an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lima v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Burguieres v. PollingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Floyd v. City of Bossier CityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Succession of DelesdernierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Jones v. BethardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Franco's Athletic Club LLC v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022