Legal Opinion
William Iselin & Co. v. Muhlstock, Elowitz & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1976PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to dismiss the appeal taken by appellants Gold Mills, Inc., and Futura Fabrics Corporation granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that the dissent at the Appellate Division was not on a question of law reviewable by the Court of Appeals (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [i]).
2Cited by13 opinions
- Harbolic v. BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People ex rel. Frazier v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Bennett v. NardoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Sciss v. Metal Polishers Union Local 8AAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People ex rel. Sales v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.