Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Rebhan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant and her son-in-law, W. J. Ruediger, executed their promissory note to appellee for $3,000. This suit was brought upon the note against appellant alone. Appellee filed with his declaration an affidavit of claim to the effect that the consideration of the note was money loaned by him to appellant. Appellant claimed a credit of $1,000 and there was a verdict and judgment for $2,150.96.

Appellant’s sole contention is that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in her favor. She concedes that she is liable on the note,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Clair County Benevolent Society v. FietsamIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Carney v. Marquette Third Vein Coal Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People ex rel. Lee v. Chicago, Indiana & Southern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCormack v. HaanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API