Legal Opinion
Baltimore Lumber Co. v. Marcus
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 30, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 9827PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Maryland corporation, has brought this action against Herbert Marcus and Louis Marder, citizens of the “State” of Pennsylvania, individually and as copartners trading as the Bilt-Well Company, to recover a balance alleged to be due plaintiff for lumber, mill-work and hardware materials furnished the defendants in their operation of a business in Maryland. Service of process was made by registered mail on defendant Marcus in accordance with the provisions of Article 75, section 78 of the Code of the Public General Laws of Maryland, 1957 Edition.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- The Tungus v. SkovgaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Albertson v. Millard, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Upjohn Co. v. Peoples Service Drug Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baltimore Lumber Co. v. MarcusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Bill's Dollar Stores, Inc. v. New Orleans Printing Services, Inc. (In re Bill's Dollar Stores, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1994