Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Smith

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1888No. 8989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order overruling a motion to quash an attachment issued upon a money decree. The Facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Merrick

In this case a decree was had against the defendants for a specific sum of money. Upon that decree an attachment by way of execution was issued, which was laid in the hands of the Columbia National Bank of Washington City, in the District of Columbia, as garnishee, the bank being summoned to appear under the garnishment, and, in answer to interrogatories, set forth that it had in its possession a certain amount of money to the credit of the defendant in the cause. A motion was made to quash the attachment upon sundry grounds:

First. That the court had no jurisdiction to issue the writ of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gay v. PEOPLES HARDWARE COMPANYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API