Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court Given Under the Provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the Constitution

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 26, 1993PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1259STATE OF MAINE

In House March 4, 1993

House Order Propounding Questions to the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court

WHEREAS, it appears to the House of Representatives of the 116th Legislature that the following are important questions of law and that this is a solemn occasion; and

WHEREAS, the Constitution of Maine, Article VI, Section 3, provides for the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court to render their opinion on these questions; and

WHEREAS, there is now before the 116th Legislature for its consideration Initiated Bill 1, Legislative Document 751, “An Act to Impose Term Limitations on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. BluntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Parker v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Laughlin v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  4. Boughton v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Tilson v. MoffordArizona Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court Given Under the Provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the ConstitutionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. League of Women Voters v. DiamondDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1996
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. League of Women Voters v. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API