Kieffer v. Capital Transit Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
In an action for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellee, in connection with a fall of appellant in alighting from one of appellee’s buses, the District Court at the conclusion of appellant’s case directed a verdict in favor of appellee because of insufficient evidence of negligence. We affirm. The cause of the fall was left in such uncertainty at the conclusion of appellant’s case that to permit the jury to attribute the claimed injuries to the negligence of appel-lee would be too speculative to warrant submission of the issue to them.
Affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Ada M. Reece and Charles Reece v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation, Capital Transit Company, a Corporation v. Ada M. Reece and Charles ReeceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Mrs. Ethel Burns (Wiggins) Marshall v. Capital Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Hryn v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Perrino v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966