Legal Opinion

In Re Stemark Associates/Request to Vacate Exemption Letter Denial

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 20, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

247 N.J. Super. 13 (1991)

588 A.2d 830

IN RE STEMARK ASSOCIATES/REQUEST TO VACATE EXEMPTION LETTER DENIAL.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 22, 1991.

Decided March 20, 1991.

Before Judges PETRELLA, MUIR, Jr. and BROCHIN.

Rachel N. Davidson argued the cause for appellant Stemark Associates (Hellring Lindeman Goldstein & Siegal, attorneys; Rachel N. Davidson, on the brief).

Carol A. Blasi, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Carol A. Blasi, on the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Smith v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Paper Mill Playhouse v. Millburn TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MCG ASSOCIATES v. Department of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Neuner v. C.G. Realty Capital Ventures-I, L.P. (In Re Sharps Run Associates, L.P.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. M. Alfieri Co. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API