State v. Beaty
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
We find no errors at all in the trial that led to the conviction of the defendant on a charge of burglary, and no fault with the sentence imposed. However, each claim of error, all thoroughly briefed and ably presented, will be separately discussed.
Information. Defendant claims that the information filed failed to apprise him of the charge brought against him. The information filed charged that the defendant did:
“Intentionally enter a building or dwelling without the consent of the person in lawful possession and with the intent to steal or commit a felony therein, to-wit: Said defendant did…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. CobbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. FlynnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. GoebelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Jones (Hollis) v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.