Yoder Yoder v. Swainbank
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The numerous assignments of error filed in this appeal, will be grouped and considered under four heads:(1) There was no irreconcilable repugnancy or inconsistency in the provisions of the lease. It is competent for the parties tó a lease to agree that its term shall be shortened upon the happening of a certain event, such as the sale of the property, and a lease containing such a provision is not so repugnant that the whole may not stand. We upheld exactly the same provision, as is objected to here, in the recent case of Anderson v. Dobkin, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 416. There…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dumn v. RothermelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Anderson v. BrinserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- DeCoursey v. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- McHendry v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Steiner v. Central Trust & Title Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.