Legal Opinion

Yoder Yoder v. Swainbank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1923No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The numerous assignments of error filed in this appeal, will be grouped and considered under four heads:(1) There was no irreconcilable repugnancy or inconsistency in the provisions of the lease. It is competent for the parties tó a lease to agree that its term shall be shortened upon the happening of a certain event, such as the sale of the property, and a lease containing such a provision is not so repugnant that the whole may not stand. We upheld exactly the same provision, as is objected to here, in the recent case of Anderson v. Dobkin, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 416. There…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dumn v. RothermelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Anderson v. BrinserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. DeCoursey v. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  4. McHendry v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Steiner v. Central Trust & Title Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federoff v. Nieratko, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1948
  2. Stewart v. Briggs, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API