Legal Opinion

Tall v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 2, 1934No. M-199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

Plaintiff bases his right to recover the difference between the retired pay of a lieutenant, junior grade, and that of an ensign upon his claim that the act of May 24, 1928, 45 Stat. 735, gives him 75 percent of the active-duty pay of a lieutenant, junior grade, in the Navy, which rank he held in the Naval Reserve on January 3, 1926, when discharged from his commissioned service in such Naval Reserve Force,, and that this was the only discharge ever received by him.

The defendant contends that the Veterans’ Bureau correctly placed plaintiff on the emergency officers’ retired list of the Navy…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Arthur T. Broche v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Perkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API