Legal Opinion
Karadzole v. Artukovic
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 1958No. 462PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for the discharge of the writ of habeas corpus and the remand of respondent to the custody of the United States Marshal in order that a hearing be held under 18 U. S. C. § 3184.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.
2Cited by15 opinions
- William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Samuel Shapiro v. Thomas E. Ferrandina, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Ziyad Abu Eain v. Peter Wilkes, United States Marshal for the Northern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Marcos Perez Jimenez v. Manuel Aristeguieta, Intervenor, and John E. MaguireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Andrija Artukovic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.