Legal Opinion
Claim of Angelo v. Triangle Broom & Brush Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The question is of coverage. The policy was issued to a copartnersMp. One of the partners retired and the remaining partner continued the business under the same name at the same place. Claimant was injured wMle employed by the business being conducted by the remaining partner. (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 252 N. Y. 518.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, N.Y. Indemnity CoNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Lazarus v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Claim of Fredenburgh v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- David Lazarus v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Matter of Smith v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018