Eley v. Hurdle

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the *290Family Court, Kings County (Staton, J.), dated January 13, 1997, as modified by an order of the same court dated February 17, 1998, which granted him limited visitation rights with the child.

Ordered that the order, as modified, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the father’s argument that the Family Court improperly placed restrictions on his visitation with his infant child, and that he is entitled to unrestricted visitation. It is well settled that the best interest of the…