Legal Opinion
Tomlinson v. County of Alameda
California Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 2012No. S188161PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
In this case, a developer applied to a county planning department for approval to build a housing subdivision. The department and the developer gave written notice to various agencies, to neighbors, and to interested parties. The notice described the proposed project, mentioned the department’s determination that the project was categorically exempt from environmental law requirements, and solicited comments. After holding public hearings, the county determined that the proposed project was categorically exempt from compliance with environmental law requirements, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Sierra Club v. San Joaquin Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. Bay Area Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- World Bus. Acad. v. Cal. State Lands Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bottini v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Defend Our Waterfront v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.