Legal Opinion
Aratari v. Cardwell
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 7, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-264PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings this action for a writ of habeas corpus under the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241(c) (3).
This matter is before the Court on the petition, the return of writ and supplemental memoranda submitted by the parties. The parties have also entered into a stipulation as to certain facts which are before the Court.
Petitioner was convicted on December 16, 1969 on a five count indictment charging him with three counts of armed robbery in violation of Section 2901.-13 of the Ohio Revised Code, one count of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FlowersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. FlowersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- United States v. Leonard Smith, United States of America v. Myron Jackson, A/K/A Hamp, United States of America v. Russell Spearman, United States of America v. Faustino Selvera, A/K/A "Mexican Frank,"Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978