Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 814). This being an action between carriers for a declaratory judgment as to the division of responsibility between them, the reasoning of Chrysler Leasing Corp. v Public Administrator, N. Y. County (85 AD2d 410) is not apposite.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chrysler Leasing Corp. v. Public AdministratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983