Nisby v. Murch

In this action of contract to recover back $500.00 deposited by the plaintiff with the defendant pending the drawing up of a written agreement for purchase and sale of a parcel of land there was a finding for the plaintiff.

The case was reported because the defendant claims to be aggrieved by the denial of her requests for rulings numbers III and V and because of an alleged inconsistency between the judge’s finding and certain of the defendant’s requests for rulings which the judge allowed.

With reference to the claim of inconsistency it is enough to say that the defendant’s remedy was either a…