Legal Opinion

Talus Corp. v. Browne

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 3, 1991No. Civ. No. 91-0167-PPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.

In this patent invalidity and noninfringement action, Defendant, owner of a patent allegedly infringed upon by Plaintiff, has moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of in personam jurisdiction under *25Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). Alternatively, Defendant seeks transfer of venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1404 if his motion to dismiss is denied by this Court. Jurisdiction of the Court arises under the Federal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Richard L. Sandstrom, Etc. v. Chemlawn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Linda Kowalski, N.K.A. Linda Larochelle v. Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury and Murphy, Attorneys at LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API